[A preface to an occasional series about my local bush]
How do I – how does
anyone – put words around a landscape? First I’d probably want to narrow down
my definition of landscape. I would start with a “small patch of bush”, a
walkable chunk of my local landscape.
[A grassy paddock marks one boundary of "the patch"] |
I could go on to
talk about its particular shape and dimensions. Picture it as a misshapen
rectangle roughly 3km long by 500m wide, giving it an area of around 150
hectares or 370 acres. But to my mind such measures, and all of the descriptors above, are like IQ scores: they
give only the roughest idea of one measure of
something-that-might-mean-nothing-at-all. Once I lived on a flattish 1300 acre
rural property. Describing its relatively featureless terrain wouldn’t have
troubled anyone’s vocabulary. It certainly didn’t fire my imagination.
[Hobart city beneath the wintry summit of kunanyi/Mt Wellington] |
Not so these 370
acres. Here imagination bursts out of any arbitrary frame I might try to put
around the “patch”. Because beyond our bush there is more bush, serious bush.
It’s possible to walk through that bush – as I have done in the past – all the way
from my home to the 1270m summit of kunanyi/Mt Wellington. And I needn’t stop
there. I could go on over the mountain and keep walking into the remote
south-west wilderness. I would need to cross only a handful of roads, most of them dirt
tracks or fire-trails.
From where I write
I look out on that bush and that mountain, and can plot just such a walk. It’s
imagination, and not just personal history, that powers our sense of a place.
And this place, this patch, with its actual connection into the wild, is one
that has held my imagination, and given me a strong sense of place, for the 30
years I’ve lived here.
[A dragonfly: the bush is home to numerous such invertebrates] |
Still, so far I’ve
said nothing that actually paints a picture of this bush: its plants, animals,
history, geology, geomorphology. And all those “-ologies” do seriously
contribute to our understanding of a place, a landscape. I have written, and
will write more, about those aspects of the patch. But for this preface to
further writings from my small patch of bush, I want to enter it imaginatively
via one recent episode, and ask: what does the bush mean to my 20 month old
granddaughter?
[Two of my granddaughters on the Christmas tree hunt: photo by Sally Oakley] |
A few of us are on a
pre-Christmas excursion, hunting for some Christmas trees. It’s been raining,
so our small granddaughter has her rain suit and gumboots on. They give her an
added degree of determination, as if she had any need of that. Before long she shakes off
any guiding hands, stomps along the track – straight through any puddles – and
stops only when there’s something interesting to pick up and examine. That
means about every 10 metres or so. It is a long excursion.
Only for the steepest bit of
track does her aunty hoist her up for a while. When we reach the feral Pinus
radiata trees, she’s down again, watching while we select a few. Things like land
tenure, weed trees, Christmas, bow saws, even time itself are probably lost on
her.
[Our 20 month old granddaughter carries her Christmas prize: photo by Sally Oakley] |
But she carries one of the smaller prizes for a while, and I wonder. Will
she remember the whiff of freshly cut pine; the soft swish of needles on her
face; the feel of warm hands; the laughter and sense of occasion; the raucous cockatoos?
And will she associate that with the bush, our bush, any bush? I suspect that’s
how our imaginations start to be fired. And why we want to put words around our
place.
No comments:
Post a Comment